Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Behbood Journal. 2010; 13 (4): 283-289
in Persian | IMEMR | ID: emr-129291

ABSTRACT

ICU patients especially those under mechanical ventilation or with a history of coagulation disorders are at the risk of stress ulcer development and related GI bleeding. Typically H2 blockers administration showed prophylactic role to control gastric acidity. Preliminary studies have shown that administration of intravenous omeperazol is effective. The object of this study was to compare the effect of oral rout administration of omerprazol with intravenous ranitidine on gastric pH. In this experimental study 40 ICU patients under mechanical ventilation allocated into same conditions and matched ranitidine and omeprazol groups [20 subjects in each group]. First group received 50 mg intravenous ranitidine twice per day and the second group received 40 mg oral omeperazol once a day. The gastric acidity was monitored using Chroning method. Gastric pH was determined before administration and three times per day after drugs administration then followed for three consequent days. Data was analyzed using T-test and SPSS software. The mean gastric pH in the Ranitidine group was 2.07 +/- 0.79 before and 2.80 +/- 0.85 after drug administration. In the Omperazol group gastric pH was 2.01 +/- 1.52 before and 3.90 +/- 1.52 after drug administration. The oral Omeperazol administration was significantly effective than intravenous Ranitidine administration [p<0.005]. Our data suggest that in critically ill patients oral rout administration of Omeparazol is more effective than intravenous H2 blocker [Ranitidine] to decrease gastric acidity and may prevent from stress ulcer


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Omeprazole , Ranitidine , Gastric Juice/metabolism , Gastric Juice/drug effects , Intensive Care Units , Stomach Ulcer/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL